VACCINES
I will need a vaccine so I don't catch Covid-19, right?
Disclaimer:
IFC is not anti-vaccine nor pro-vaccine. Our position at IFC is that we are pro choice and against any forced medical procedure, in line with the Human Right's Act and the Nuremberg Code. We believe people have the right to make informed choice when deciding what they put into their body.
Please note that information is changing on the subject of vaccines on a daily basis. We have published the basics here, but further developments can be found on our Updates section.
I will need a vaccine so I don't catch Covid-19, right?
Covid-19 vaccination programmes are being rolled out around the world, with millions already having had the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Pfizer describes its vaccine as having a 90% efficiency rate, whilst Moderna is promising an efficiency rate of 94%. Deaths alleged to be from Covid-19 are around 0.0024% (NHS figures from 2020) - meaning that 99.9976% of the UK population either won't get it or will recover from it. The average age of someone allegedly dying from Covid-19 is 82.4 years, and they are also dying of a serious illness or illnesses at the time.
Assuming it is true that the vaccines have up to a 94% efficiency rate, and assuming that you aren't over 75 with a serious, pre-existing life-threatening disease, one must question taking the risk of a vaccine for a 'virus' that over 80% of people have immunity to, and of those that do get symptoms, almost 100% will recover? And although an efficiency rate of over 90% sounds good on paper, it doesn't sound quite so good when you follow the real science.
The overwhelming information, as evidenced throughout this site, proves that the vast majority of people are unlikely to get any symptoms at all, and some will possibly get mild symptoms in the flu season, and if you do get sick, you are almost 100% likely to recover – as you would with the flu.
​
Here's Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty, admitting that most of us won't get ill: see link
​
If you are following how the vaccine trials are going, you may be alarmed to learn that: “None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.” (From the BMJ.)
​
The BMJ article also went on to say: “Hospital admissions and deaths from Covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30 000 people. The same is true of its ability to save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out.”
Read the full article here
​
Hang on! We've been using vaccines for years. They must be safe?
​
There are risks with ALL vaccines, no matter how well established. The list of side-effects can be found on the paper inserts, and those side-effects include death. You don't hear much about vaccine injury and death in the media. However, you need to remember that the pharmaceutical industry has deep pockets and the best lawyers – and they also spend more on advertising than most other businesses. The media is unlikely to report negatively on their best clients and risk losing that income.
Consider also the speed at which this Covid-19 vaccine has been rolled out. Now consider that all other vaccines take, on average, over 10 years to develop, and that most of that 10 years will be taken up by safety trials... and even after all that testing, vaccines STILL cause serious harm and sometimes death. Do you think a vaccine rushed through in a matter of months will be any safer than existing vaccines? How is it possible to assess long-term effects in such a short trail period?
You may recall in September 2009, Swine Flu was declared a pandemic with identical fear-mongering from the media, politicians, and the pharmaceutical industry – all backed up by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Billions was spent on vaccines, with contracts eventually cancelled as it emerged there was no pandemic. The financial cost was huge... but there was an even bigger cost... those people damaged by the vaccines. Sounding familiar?
Indeed, it may shock you to learn that there has never been a double-blind, placebo-controlled study done on any vaccine. This means that no vaccine has ever been proven to be completely safe. When vaccines are tested, they are not tested against a placebo – that is, a control group that hasn't had a vaccine. They are tested against a 'control-group' that has had a different vaccine! Think about that. Not one vaccine has ever been tested properly and there have been no official studies carried out on vaccinated versus unvaccinated people over any amount of time.
But Pfizer is a well-known pharmaceutical giant. They must be trustworthy!
None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.
British Medical Journal
Pfizer, one of the leading names in the manufacture of Covid-19 vaccines, is world leader in one unfortunate area – it holds the record for the highest fine for healthcare fraud in history. In 2009, Pfizer was fined £1.4 billion ($2.3 billion) for illegally promoting 4 drugs for uses that had not been approved by medical regulators – for the full story see:
Pfizer holds another record, too. More recently, in 2016, Pfizer was fined £84.2 million for overcharging the NHS by 2600% (meaning it overcharged the taxpayers of the UK – us, in other words).
Pfizer has also had a number of other lawsuits with huge payouts:
-
2012 – After nearly 10,000 women filed a lawsuit related to getting breast cancer from Prempo, a hormonal drug, Pfizer had settled most of the claims for over $1 billion by 2012.
-
2013 – Pfizer agreed to pay $55 million in criminal damages after it failed to warn about the risks of kidney damage due to its proton pump inhibiter, Protonix.
-
2012/13 – Pfizer set aside $288 million to resolve cases filed in the Chantix (anti-smoking drug) lawsuit after the drug caused suicidal thoughts and severe psychological disorders.
-
2018 (ongoing) – more than 6,000 Depo-Testosterone lawsuits are pending. Complainants listed the issues caused by the drug as: strokes, blood clots, and heart attacks.
Pfizer has had other lawsuits closed down for insufficient evidence (at the time of making the claims), and has had to recall a number of their drugs (Prempro in 2013, and Effexor XR in 2014, being the 2 most well known of the drugs recalled).
There was also the Trovan scandal in Nigeria, in 1996. The company paid out £50 million to families of children damaged by the antibiotic drug during a human meningitis trial. The payout was made in 2009 – but Nigeria is demanding $7 billion in damages for what it states were illegal drug trials.
So, now you have some background on the main company currently approved to provide the Covid-19 vaccine in the UK, you can make an informed choice as to whether or not you trust their vaccine.
I've read this is a totally new type of vaccine, so perhaps it will be safer than the others?
​
It certainly is a new type of vaccine, that part is true... however, safety concerns remain. Critics say the mRNA vaccine will alter the DNA of humans receiving the vaccine, whilst the authorities and pharmaceutical companies say this is untrue – but without longterm human studies, who can say?
Aside from the new experimental technology involved in the mRNA vaccine and the extremely short trial period prior to it being used on humans, there is also the question of vaccine ingredients. Here are a few ingredients being passed off as 'safe' by the CDC:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/ingredients.html
​
It's interesting to note that the CDC thinks that ingesting toxic materials is somehow the same as injecting them straight into your body.
If you ingest a toxic chemical, for example, the body can try to remove it via vomiting, sweating (fever symptoms), urination, or defecation. But how do you remove toxic material from your blood and tissues?
The CDC also avoided mention of more controversial ingredients, such as animal RNA and aborted foetal tissue. All other mainstream media outlets that we reviewed for accurate information on vaccine ingredients played down the toxic element of the chemicals (such as aluminium, mercury, and formaldehyde), and left the most controversial ingredients out of the articles altogether.
Then there's the main ingredient, which is the Covid-19 virus, itself. Obviously, this would be the star ingredient for a vaccine purporting to give the public Covid-19 immunity. But, as we've already established, our Government will not admit that Covid-19 exists, so this is an important issue. How can a vaccine feature an ingredient, a virus in whole or part, that has not been proven to exist?
If you aren't sure about taking a vaccine (for anything), it's always worth asking for the insert and going off to read the ingredients and look up unknown ones online – although it's been reported that many doctors and nurses try and put you off doing this and pressurise you to have the vaccine then and there. You have the right to insist, however, and legally speaking, all medical procedures (vaccines being such a procedure) require informed consent - meaning you should understand the risks and be able to read the ingredients before agreeing to have the vaccine.
Be aware that certain ingredients are disguised to make it less obvious what they really are – MRC-5, for example, is listed as an ingredient in many vaccines, and it sounds like a chemical of some sort. However, MRC-5 is actually aborted foetal tissue. And Thiomersal, which is also a regular ingredient in vaccines, is actually a form of mercury.
If you're interested in finding out more about the dangers of vaccine ingredients, here's a short video on the subject featuring a doctor giving powerful evidence at a CT Public Health hearing, September 2020.
​
​
The vaccine must be safe – the payout for damages worldwide would be too high for the vaccine companies to take the risk of pushing a dangerous product!
Although Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies have paid out massive sums to victims of their drugs and vaccines, this was based on the companies breaking the law rather than side-effects of vaccines – lying about the drug's suitability for treating a disease, covering up adverse effects in trials to get the drug onto the market, and so on.
The reason the payouts are not for vaccine damages and deaths is because drug companies are no longer responsible for vaccine damage. This responsibility was taken on by governments back in 1979 – which means that you, the taxpayer, have to foot the bill for all those killed or disabled by vaccines since that time:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/17/contents
​
When it comes to the Covid-19 vaccine, the Government has specifically removed liability from Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers:
​
And once it became apparent that NHS staff were to be first in line for the Covid-19 experimental vaccine, many of them formed a group to fight the decision:
​
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/coronavirus-nhs-staff-flock-to-anti-vax-group-k8sq7q63w?s=07
​
It is of grave concern that the UK Government's Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has put out a tender for a company specialising in AI (artificial intelligence) to set up a system to deal with deaths and other adverse reactions to the vaccine:
https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED%3ANOTICE%3A506291-2020%3ATEXT%3AEN%3AHTML&src=0
​
The tender document states:
Short description:
The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.
This is very worrying. This tender indicates that the Government expects a large amount of adverse reactions to the vaccine. And the fact the tender was put out in Europe, rather than the UK, suggest this document is being hidden from the British public.
So, if you still think the pharmaceutical companies have a financial responsibility to ensure their vaccines do no harm, now you know the truth. They have no liability whatsoever.
Also of concern is the number of politicians and their advisers who stand to gain from vaccine rollouts, given that they have an interest in pharmaceutical companies.
There is Vallance with his £600,000 shares in GlaxoSmithKlein, and Chancellor Rishi Sunak, and his links to Moderna (another pharmaceutical company that has a contract with the UK Government for a vaccine).
Then there are all the MPs and their aids and advisers (and their spouses and family members) who will gain from contracts worth billions - contracts given out without tender! The National Audit Office found 1,300 contracts worth £10.5 BILLION were awarded by the UK Government with no competitive tender offered, whatsoever:
With so much money at stake, and pressure on pharmaceutical companies to secure contracts for their vaccines, perhaps it's worth taking a step back and doing some extra research into the Covid-19 vaccine before you consider having it.
And remember, our Government and the media like to reference 'the science'. But science that can't be questioned is not science at all but a belief system or a cult. And that sort of science is dangerous. So always ask the difficult questions and make sure that anything you consider putting into your body that could impact your health is 100% safe.
Still not convinced? Ask yourself these important questions...
-
Is there anything natural I could do to improve my health and immune system to stop me getting ill? Such as taking health supplements and improving my diet and lifestyle?
-
Am I fully aware of the dangers of taking an unlicensed vaccine with experimental technology in it?
-
Have I read the paper insert of the vaccine, and do I understand what is in it and what those ingredients mean?
-
Am I on any other medication that could cause a dangerous reaction to the vaccine ingredients?
-
Have I established that I will get an appropriate amount of compensation if my health is damaged by the vaccine?
-
Have I established that my family will receive and appropriate amount of compensation if I die from the vaccination?
​